commit 039ff07dd1a02e6c9cff335551f05bfe8269224b
author Sameer Agarwal <sameeragarwal@google.com> Tue Feb 26 09:15:39 2013 -0800
committer Gerrit Code Review <noreply-gerritcodereview@google.com> Wed Feb 27 05:38:28 2013 +0000
tree 1fda422fc71d23ba281e78918b0340e07c8a1d2d
parent c3fd3b960e489348d5b2c8b8f0167760e52ecbd9

Evaluate ResidualBlocks without LossFunction if needed.

1. Add the ability to evaluate the problem without loss function.
2. Remove static Evaluator::Evaluate
3. Refactor the common code from problem_test.cc and
   evaluator_test.cc into evaluator_test_utils.cc

Change-Id: I1aa841580afe91d288fbb65288b0ffdd1e43e827

internal/ceres/problem_impl.cc

diff --git a/internal/ceres/problem_impl.cc b/internal/ceres/problem_impl.cc
index 1fb9e39..21d1144 100644
--- a/internal/ceres/problem_impl.cc
+++ b/internal/ceres/problem_impl.cc
@@ -651,7 +651,12 @@
   program.ParameterBlocksToStateVector(parameters.data());
 
   double tmp_cost = 0;
-  bool status = evaluator->Evaluate(parameters.data(),
+
+  Evaluator::EvaluateOptions evaluator_evaluate_options;
+  evaluator_evaluate_options.apply_loss_function =
+      evaluate_options.apply_loss_function;
+  bool status = evaluator->Evaluate(evaluator_evaluate_options,
+                                    parameters.data(),
                                     &tmp_cost,
                                     residuals != NULL ? &(*residuals)[0] : NULL,
                                     gradient != NULL ? &(*gradient)[0] : NULL,