blob: 0c0ceaaecd06bb47584fba6b436c3c4e86302e0e [file] [log] [blame]
Keir Mierle8ebb0732012-04-30 23:09:08 -07001// Ceres Solver - A fast non-linear least squares minimizer
2// Copyright 2010, 2011, 2012 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
3// http://code.google.com/p/ceres-solver/
4//
5// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
6// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
7//
8// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
9// this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
10// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
11// this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
12// and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
13// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its contributors may be
14// used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without
15// specific prior written permission.
16//
17// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
18// AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
19// IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
20// ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
21// LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
22// CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
23// SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
24// INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
25// CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
26// ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
27// POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
28//
29// Author: sameeragarwal@google.com (Sameer Agarwal)
30//
31// The LossFunction interface is the way users describe how residuals
32// are converted to cost terms for the overall problem cost function.
33// For the exact manner in which loss functions are converted to the
34// overall cost for a problem, see problem.h.
35//
36// For least squares problem where there are no outliers and standard
37// squared loss is expected, it is not necessary to create a loss
38// function; instead passing a NULL to the problem when adding
39// residuals implies a standard squared loss.
40//
41// For least squares problems where the minimization may encounter
42// input terms that contain outliers, that is, completely bogus
43// measurements, it is important to use a loss function that reduces
44// their associated penalty.
45//
46// Consider a structure from motion problem. The unknowns are 3D
47// points and camera parameters, and the measurements are image
48// coordinates describing the expected reprojected position for a
49// point in a camera. For example, we want to model the geometry of a
50// street scene with fire hydrants and cars, observed by a moving
51// camera with unknown parameters, and the only 3D points we care
52// about are the pointy tippy-tops of the fire hydrants. Our magic
53// image processing algorithm, which is responsible for producing the
54// measurements that are input to Ceres, has found and matched all
55// such tippy-tops in all image frames, except that in one of the
56// frame it mistook a car's headlight for a hydrant. If we didn't do
57// anything special (i.e. if we used a basic quadratic loss), the
58// residual for the erroneous measurement will result in extreme error
59// due to the quadratic nature of squared loss. This results in the
60// entire solution getting pulled away from the optimimum to reduce
61// the large error that would otherwise be attributed to the wrong
62// measurement.
63//
64// Using a robust loss function, the cost for large residuals is
65// reduced. In the example above, this leads to outlier terms getting
66// downweighted so they do not overly influence the final solution.
67//
68// What cost function is best?
69//
70// In general, there isn't a principled way to select a robust loss
71// function. The authors suggest starting with a non-robust cost, then
72// only experimenting with robust loss functions if standard squared
73// loss doesn't work.
74
75#ifndef CERES_PUBLIC_LOSS_FUNCTION_H_
76#define CERES_PUBLIC_LOSS_FUNCTION_H_
77
78#include <glog/logging.h>
79#include "ceres/internal/macros.h"
80#include "ceres/internal/scoped_ptr.h"
81#include "ceres/types.h"
82
83namespace ceres {
84
85class LossFunction {
86 public:
87 virtual ~LossFunction() {}
88
89 // For a residual vector with squared 2-norm 'sq_norm', this method
90 // is required to fill in the value and derivatives of the loss
91 // function (rho in this example):
92 //
93 // out[0] = rho(sq_norm),
94 // out[1] = rho'(sq_norm),
95 // out[2] = rho''(sq_norm),
96 //
97 // Here the convention is that the contribution of a term to the
98 // cost function is given by 1/2 rho(s), where
99 //
100 // s = ||residuals||^2.
101 //
102 // Calling the method with a negative value of 's' is an error and
103 // the implementations are not required to handle that case.
104 //
105 // Most sane choices of rho() satisfy:
106 //
107 // rho(0) = 0,
108 // rho'(0) = 1,
109 // rho'(s) < 1 in outlier region,
110 // rho''(s) < 0 in outlier region,
111 //
112 // so that they mimic the least squares cost for small residuals.
113 virtual void Evaluate(double sq_norm, double out[3]) const = 0;
114};
115
116// Some common implementations follow below.
117//
118// Note: in the region of interest (i.e. s < 3) we have:
119// TrivialLoss >= HuberLoss >= SoftLOneLoss >= CauchyLoss
120
121
122// This corresponds to no robustification.
123//
124// rho(s) = s
125//
126// At s = 0: rho = [0, 1, 0].
127//
128// It is not normally necessary to use this, as passing NULL for the
129// loss function when building the problem accomplishes the same
130// thing.
131class TrivialLoss : public LossFunction {
132 public:
133 virtual void Evaluate(double, double*) const;
134};
135
136// Scaling
137// -------
138// Given one robustifier
139// s -> rho(s)
140// one can change the length scale at which robustification takes
141// place, by adding a scale factor 'a' as follows:
142//
143// s -> a^2 rho(s / a^2).
144//
145// The first and second derivatives are:
146//
147// s -> rho'(s / a^2),
148// s -> (1 / a^2) rho''(s / a^2),
149//
150// but the behaviour near s = 0 is the same as the original function,
151// i.e.
152//
153// rho(s) = s + higher order terms,
154// a^2 rho(s / a^2) = s + higher order terms.
155//
156// The scalar 'a' should be positive.
157//
158// The reason for the appearance of squaring is that 'a' is in the
159// units of the residual vector norm whereas 's' is a squared
160// norm. For applications it is more convenient to specify 'a' than
161// its square. The commonly used robustifiers below are described in
162// un-scaled format (a = 1) but their implementations work for any
163// non-zero value of 'a'.
164
165// Huber.
166//
167// rho(s) = s for s <= 1,
168// rho(s) = 2 sqrt(s) - 1 for s >= 1.
169//
170// At s = 0: rho = [0, 1, 0].
171//
172// The scaling parameter 'a' corresponds to 'delta' on this page:
173// http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huber_Loss_Function
174class HuberLoss : public LossFunction {
175 public:
176 explicit HuberLoss(double a) : a_(a), b_(a * a) { }
177 virtual void Evaluate(double, double*) const;
Sameer Agarwal0c714a72012-08-20 11:18:16 -0700178
Keir Mierle8ebb0732012-04-30 23:09:08 -0700179 private:
180 const double a_;
181 // b = a^2.
182 const double b_;
183};
184
185// Soft L1, similar to Huber but smooth.
186//
187// rho(s) = 2 (sqrt(1 + s) - 1).
188//
189// At s = 0: rho = [0, 1, -1/2].
190class SoftLOneLoss : public LossFunction {
191 public:
192 explicit SoftLOneLoss(double a) : b_(a * a), c_(1 / b_) { }
193 virtual void Evaluate(double, double*) const;
Sameer Agarwal0c714a72012-08-20 11:18:16 -0700194
Keir Mierle8ebb0732012-04-30 23:09:08 -0700195 private:
196 // b = a^2.
197 const double b_;
198 // c = 1 / a^2.
199 const double c_;
200};
201
202// Inspired by the Cauchy distribution
203//
204// rho(s) = log(1 + s).
205//
206// At s = 0: rho = [0, 1, -1].
207class CauchyLoss : public LossFunction {
208 public:
209 explicit CauchyLoss(double a) : b_(a * a), c_(1 / b_) { }
210 virtual void Evaluate(double, double*) const;
Sameer Agarwal0c714a72012-08-20 11:18:16 -0700211
Keir Mierle8ebb0732012-04-30 23:09:08 -0700212 private:
213 // b = a^2.
214 const double b_;
215 // c = 1 / a^2.
216 const double c_;
217};
218
Sameer Agarwalad1f7b72012-08-20 11:10:34 -0700219// Loss that is capped beyond a certain level using the arc-tangent function.
220// The scaling parameter 'a' determines the level where falloff occurs.
221// For costs much smaller than 'a', the loss function is linear and behaves like
222// TrivialLoss, and for values much larger than 'a' the value asymptotically
223// approaches the constant value of a * PI / 2.
224//
225// rho(s) = a atan(s / a).
226//
227// At s = 0: rho = [0, 1, 0].
228class ArctanLoss : public LossFunction {
229 public:
230 explicit ArctanLoss(double a) : a_(a), b_(1 / (a * a)) { }
231 virtual void Evaluate(double, double*) const;
Sameer Agarwal0c714a72012-08-20 11:18:16 -0700232
Sameer Agarwalad1f7b72012-08-20 11:10:34 -0700233 private:
234 const double a_;
235 // b = 1 / a^2.
236 const double b_;
237};
238
239// Loss function that maps to approximately zero cost in a range around the
240// origin, and reverts to linear in error (quadratic in cost) beyond this range.
241// The tolerance parameter 'a' sets the nominal point at which the
242// transition occurs, and the transition size parameter 'b' sets the nominal
243// distance over which most of the transition occurs. Both a and b must be
244// greater than zero, and typically b will be set to a fraction of a.
245// The slope rho'[s] varies smoothly from about 0 at s <= a - b to
246// about 1 at s >= a + b.
247//
248// The term is computed as:
249//
250// rho(s) = b log(1 + exp((s - a) / b)) - c0.
251//
252// where c0 is chosen so that rho(0) == 0
253//
254// c0 = b log(1 + exp(-a / b)
255//
256// This has the following useful properties:
257//
258// rho(s) == 0 for s = 0
259// rho'(s) ~= 0 for s << a - b
260// rho'(s) ~= 1 for s >> a + b
261// rho''(s) > 0 for all s
262//
263// In addition, all derivatives are continuous, and the curvature is
264// concentrated in the range a - b to a + b.
265//
266// At s = 0: rho = [0, ~0, ~0].
267class TolerantLoss : public LossFunction {
268 public:
269 explicit TolerantLoss(double a, double b);
270 virtual void Evaluate(double, double*) const;
271
272 private:
273 const double a_, b_, c_;
274};
275
276// Composition of two loss functions. The error is the result of first
277// evaluating g followed by f to yield the composition f(g(s)).
278// The loss functions must not be NULL.
279class ComposedLoss : public LossFunction {
280 public:
281 explicit ComposedLoss(const LossFunction* f, Ownership ownership_f,
282 const LossFunction* g, Ownership ownership_g);
283 virtual ~ComposedLoss();
284 virtual void Evaluate(double, double*) const;
285
286 private:
287 internal::scoped_ptr<const LossFunction> f_, g_;
288 const Ownership ownership_f_, ownership_g_;
289};
290
Keir Mierle8ebb0732012-04-30 23:09:08 -0700291// The discussion above has to do with length scaling: it affects the space
292// in which s is measured. Sometimes you want to simply scale the output
293// value of the robustifier. For example, you might want to weight
294// different error terms differently (e.g., weight pixel reprojection
295// errors differently from terrain errors).
296//
297// If rho is the wrapped robustifier, then this simply outputs
298// s -> a * rho(s)
299//
300// The first and second derivatives are, not surprisingly
301// s -> a * rho'(s)
302// s -> a * rho''(s)
303//
304// Since we treat the a NULL Loss function as the Identity loss
305// function, rho = NULL is a valid input and will result in the input
306// being scaled by a. This provides a simple way of implementing a
307// scaled ResidualBlock.
308class ScaledLoss : public LossFunction {
309 public:
310 // Constructs a ScaledLoss wrapping another loss function. Takes
311 // ownership of the wrapped loss function or not depending on the
312 // ownership parameter.
313 ScaledLoss(const LossFunction* rho, double a, Ownership ownership) :
314 rho_(rho), a_(a), ownership_(ownership) { }
315
316 virtual ~ScaledLoss() {
317 if (ownership_ == DO_NOT_TAKE_OWNERSHIP) {
318 rho_.release();
319 }
320 }
321 virtual void Evaluate(double, double*) const;
322
323 private:
324 internal::scoped_ptr<const LossFunction> rho_;
325 const double a_;
326 const Ownership ownership_;
Sameer Agarwal237d6592012-05-30 20:34:49 -0700327 CERES_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ScaledLoss);
Keir Mierle8ebb0732012-04-30 23:09:08 -0700328};
329
330// Sometimes after the optimization problem has been constructed, we
331// wish to mutate the scale of the loss function. For example, when
332// performing estimation from data which has substantial outliers,
333// convergence can be improved by starting out with a large scale,
334// optimizing the problem and then reducing the scale. This can have
335// better convergence behaviour than just using a loss function with a
336// small scale.
337//
338// This templated class allows the user to implement a loss function
339// whose scale can be mutated after an optimization problem has been
340// constructed.
341//
342// Example usage
343//
344// Problem problem;
345//
346// // Add parameter blocks
347//
348// CostFunction* cost_function =
349// new AutoDiffCostFunction < UW_Camera_Mapper, 2, 9, 3>(
350// new UW_Camera_Mapper(data->observations[2*i + 0],
351// data->observations[2*i + 1]));
352//
353// LossFunctionWrapper* loss_function(new HuberLoss(1.0), TAKE_OWNERSHIP);
354//
355// problem.AddResidualBlock(cost_function, loss_function, parameters);
356//
357// Solver::Options options;
358// scoped_ptr<Solver::Summary> summary1(Solve(problem, options));
359//
360// loss_function->Reset(new HuberLoss(1.0), TAKE_OWNERSHIP);
361//
362// scoped_ptr<Solver::Summary> summary2(Solve(problem, options));
363//
364class LossFunctionWrapper : public LossFunction {
365 public:
366 LossFunctionWrapper(LossFunction* rho, Ownership ownership)
367 : rho_(rho), ownership_(ownership) {
368 }
369
370 virtual ~LossFunctionWrapper() {
371 if (ownership_ == DO_NOT_TAKE_OWNERSHIP) {
372 rho_.release();
373 }
374 }
375
376 virtual void Evaluate(double sq_norm, double out[3]) const {
377 CHECK_NOTNULL(rho_.get());
378 rho_->Evaluate(sq_norm, out);
379 }
380
381 void Reset(LossFunction* rho, Ownership ownership) {
382 if (ownership_ == DO_NOT_TAKE_OWNERSHIP) {
383 rho_.release();
384 }
385 rho_.reset(rho);
386 ownership_ = ownership;
387 }
388
389 private:
390 internal::scoped_ptr<const LossFunction> rho_;
391 Ownership ownership_;
Sameer Agarwal237d6592012-05-30 20:34:49 -0700392 CERES_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(LossFunctionWrapper);
Keir Mierle8ebb0732012-04-30 23:09:08 -0700393};
394
395} // namespace ceres
396
397#endif // CERES_PUBLIC_LOSS_FUNCTION_H_