Keir Mierle | 8ebb073 | 2012-04-30 23:09:08 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | // Ceres Solver - A fast non-linear least squares minimizer |
| 2 | // Copyright 2010, 2011, 2012 Google Inc. All rights reserved. |
| 3 | // http://code.google.com/p/ceres-solver/ |
| 4 | // |
| 5 | // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without |
| 6 | // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: |
| 7 | // |
| 8 | // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, |
| 9 | // this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. |
| 10 | // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, |
| 11 | // this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation |
| 12 | // and/or other materials provided with the distribution. |
| 13 | // * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its contributors may be |
| 14 | // used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without |
| 15 | // specific prior written permission. |
| 16 | // |
| 17 | // THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" |
| 18 | // AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE |
| 19 | // IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE |
| 20 | // ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE |
| 21 | // LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR |
| 22 | // CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF |
| 23 | // SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS |
| 24 | // INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN |
| 25 | // CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) |
| 26 | // ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE |
| 27 | // POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. |
| 28 | // |
| 29 | // Author: sameeragarwal@google.com (Sameer Agarwal) |
| 30 | // |
| 31 | // An implementation of the Canonical Views clustering algorithm from |
| 32 | // "Scene Summarization for Online Image Collections", Ian Simon, Noah |
| 33 | // Snavely, Steven M. Seitz, ICCV 2007. |
| 34 | // |
| 35 | // More details can be found at |
| 36 | // http://grail.cs.washington.edu/projects/canonview/ |
| 37 | // |
| 38 | // Ceres uses this algorithm to perform view clustering for |
| 39 | // constructing visibility based preconditioners. |
| 40 | |
| 41 | #ifndef CERES_INTERNAL_CANONICAL_VIEWS_CLUSTERING_H_ |
| 42 | #define CERES_INTERNAL_CANONICAL_VIEWS_CLUSTERING_H_ |
| 43 | |
| 44 | #include <vector> |
| 45 | |
| 46 | #include <glog/logging.h> |
| 47 | #include "ceres/collections_port.h" |
| 48 | #include "ceres/graph.h" |
| 49 | #include "ceres/map_util.h" |
| 50 | #include "ceres/internal/macros.h" |
| 51 | |
| 52 | namespace ceres { |
| 53 | namespace internal { |
| 54 | |
| 55 | class CanonicalViewsClusteringOptions; |
| 56 | |
| 57 | // Compute a partitioning of the vertices of the graph using the |
| 58 | // canonical views clustering algorithm. |
| 59 | // |
| 60 | // In the following we will use the terms vertices and views |
| 61 | // interchangably. Given a weighted Graph G(V,E), the canonical views |
| 62 | // of G are the the set of vertices that best "summarize" the content |
| 63 | // of the graph. If w_ij i s the weight connecting the vertex i to |
| 64 | // vertex j, and C is the set of canonical views. Then the objective |
| 65 | // of the canonical views algorithm is |
| 66 | // |
| 67 | // E[C] = sum_[i in V] max_[j in C] w_ij |
| 68 | // - size_penalty_weight * |C| |
| 69 | // - similarity_penalty_weight * sum_[i in C, j in C, j > i] w_ij |
| 70 | // |
| 71 | // alpha is the size penalty that penalizes large number of canonical |
| 72 | // views. |
| 73 | // |
| 74 | // beta is the similarity penalty that penalizes canonical views that |
| 75 | // are too similar to other canonical views. |
| 76 | // |
| 77 | // Thus the canonical views algorithm tries to find a canonical view |
| 78 | // for each vertex in the graph which best explains it, while trying |
| 79 | // to minimize the number of canonical views and the overlap between |
| 80 | // them. |
| 81 | // |
| 82 | // We further augment the above objective function by allowing for per |
| 83 | // vertex weights, higher weights indicating a higher preference for |
| 84 | // being chosen as a canonical view. Thus if w_i is the vertex weight |
| 85 | // for vertex i, the objective function is then |
| 86 | // |
| 87 | // E[C] = sum_[i in V] max_[j in C] w_ij |
| 88 | // - size_penalty_weight * |C| |
| 89 | // - similarity_penalty_weight * sum_[i in C, j in C, j > i] w_ij |
| 90 | // + view_score_weight * sum_[i in C] w_i |
| 91 | // |
| 92 | // centers will contain the vertices that are the identified |
| 93 | // as the canonical views/cluster centers, and membership is a map |
| 94 | // from vertices to cluster_ids. The i^th cluster center corresponds |
| 95 | // to the i^th cluster. |
| 96 | // |
| 97 | // It is possible depending on the configuration of the clustering |
| 98 | // algorithm that some of the vertices may not be assigned to any |
| 99 | // cluster. In this case they are assigned to a cluster with id = -1; |
| 100 | void ComputeCanonicalViewsClustering( |
| 101 | const Graph<int>& graph, |
| 102 | const CanonicalViewsClusteringOptions& options, |
| 103 | vector<int>* centers, |
| 104 | HashMap<int, int>* membership); |
| 105 | |
| 106 | struct CanonicalViewsClusteringOptions { |
| 107 | CanonicalViewsClusteringOptions() |
| 108 | : min_views(3), |
| 109 | size_penalty_weight(5.75), |
| 110 | similarity_penalty_weight(100.0), |
| 111 | view_score_weight(0.0) { |
| 112 | } |
| 113 | // The minimum number of canonical views to compute. |
| 114 | int min_views; |
| 115 | |
| 116 | // Penalty weight for the number of canonical views. A higher |
| 117 | // number will result in fewer canonical views. |
| 118 | double size_penalty_weight; |
| 119 | |
| 120 | // Penalty weight for the diversity (orthogonality) of the |
| 121 | // canonical views. A higher number will encourage less similar |
| 122 | // canonical views. |
| 123 | double similarity_penalty_weight; |
| 124 | |
| 125 | // Weight for per-view scores. Lower weight places less |
| 126 | // confidence in the view scores. |
| 127 | double view_score_weight; |
| 128 | }; |
| 129 | |
| 130 | } // namespace internal |
| 131 | } // namespace ceres |
| 132 | |
| 133 | #endif // CERES_INTERNAL_CANONICAL_VIEWS_CLUSTERING_H_ |